Tips on how to win consistently when betting on soccer

Even if you win 55% of your bets, you will come out ahead consistently. However, this is easier said than done and involves more than just reading and checking injury reports. If Paul the octopus selected all the winners of the recent soccer World Cup, picking the winning soccer teams should be just as easy, right? Wrong. If it were that easy, a lot of people would be making money and sportsbooks would have to close. If winning at soccer betting involves some knowledge, some strategy and, let’s face it, a bit of luck, it’s because the bookmakers set very strict lines for the games. However, if you keep the following tips in mind, you should improve your chances of winning.

Bet as soon as you can. Many of the sportsbooks post their lines as soon as they can and some offshore bookmakers do so on Sunday afternoon for the following week’s games. If you find a game and odds you like, make sure there are no serious injury issues for the team you pick. Bookmakers are not perfect and they can make mistakes when setting the line. Jump early before the high stakes kill the bugs.

Focus on a few teams. Because knowledge is important, by concentrating on just a few teams you can accumulate a substantial amount of knowledge that you can use to place your bets. Also limit your bets to just a few games every Sunday.

Avoid heavy favorites. The crowd loves favorites and will be quick to bet on them. However, they are not good options if you want to maintain your 55% winning bet average. Even if you win a few, the payouts will be small. The best strategy is to bet on the short-term underdogs because when you win, you usually win more than you staked.

Use totals judiciously. Totals set earlier in the week are generally based on fair weather predictions. In late-season games, rain or snow sometimes affects the score, and a strong wind almost always keeps the score low. In these conditions, you would do well to bet the Under

Classification of use of yards per play. One method of evaluating teams is to look at offensive yards gained per play and defensive yards given away per play. Teams that win more than they lose end up winning more games. Statistics are readily available and you can calculate the difference with a positive difference as an advantage. The general rule of thumb for calculating a point distribution from yardage differential is that every 0.15 yards is worth one point. A difference of 0.60 yards between the two teams is worth four points. As with all betting tools, use your other data and information to confirm your findings.

Don’t avoid pranksters. There is a common perception that teasers are scams and therefore best avoided. Under certain circumstances, an NFL cash-in that is a two-game accumulator may make sense.

Pay attention to injury reports. Read injury reports carefully to determine what difference it will make to the performance of your chosen team. Don’t just look at the key players because every guy on the team has to perform at his best.


Jason Richardson Dunk or How to Increase Vertical Jump

In case you haven’t heard yet, Jason Richardson is now a Charlotte Bobcat! On June 28, 2007, Richardson, along with the draft rights to Golden State’s 2007 draft pick of forward Jermareo Davidson with the 36th pick, were traded to the Charlotte Bobcats for the draft rights to the 8th pick. Brandan Wright.

But you probably know that J-Rich is one of only two players, along with Michael Jordan, to have won two NBA dunk contests. In the 2003 competition, Richardson wowed the basketball world with a successful one-handed, between-the-legs, back dunk.

In fact, Jason Richardson’s unlikely dunk between the legs and behind the head to win the 2003 dunk contest was voted the best dunk of the dunk contest by users. With 94 percent of the fanatic judges giving Richardson a perfect 10 for this color, J-Rich beat out Michael Jordan, Vince Carter and others for the overall title.

“I really wanted to win the dunk contest. It was something I’d been dreaming about since I was a little kid. To really be there and have to ‘spin the wheel,’ I was hoping it would land on Dominique. Wilkins’ dunk because I knew them all and could do them all. I was lucky… I think there was one more pin and it would have landed on someone else’s dunk, but it ended up on Dominique Wilkins’ dunk.” -Jason Richardson

Although J-Rich always had crazy jumps: “For me, jumping has always been a given”, that doesn’t mean he doesn’t work on it at all. For example, J-Rich used to jump rope
1000 times a day, 2 sets of 300 and one set of 400, 5 times a week! After each week he increased his reps per set by 100.

Jumproping is one of the most efficient exercises that works to increase the vertical. It works all the major muscles of the lower body (calves, quads, hamstrings) and, to a lesser extent, the upper body. But be careful: do not jump every day, you will only overwork your legs and lose verticality.

Here are the other exercises he used to improve his vertical:

Cone Hops:

Lay out 8 cones in a straight line (at 3-foot intervals). Now quickly jump over the cones, one at a time, with both legs. Do not make more than 5 passes at a time. You can also use just one leg.

depth jump:

Starting position: Stand on a 2-foot box and hold a 10-pound medicine ball in your hands. Now drop down, land on two feet, and quickly explode up to touch the hoop (or dunk the ball). Do 10 to 15 repetitions.

For more jumping exercises and crucial things to know about vertical jumping (like why what you “don’t” do is often more important than what you “do”), take a look at this page. I highly recommend:


How Dog Ownership Has Changed Over 80 Years

An online search for comments and opinions declares that owning a dog in 1960 was very different than it is today. A quarter of the dogs at the time were random strays, owned or not. Ownership rules were much less well defined. Even though there were commercial dog foods available and a Milk Bone treat company, the dog food industry only appealed to a few dog owners. Conventional dogs survived on table scraps and pouring sauce on your dog’s food was a big trend!

Dog Trends of the 1960s

The ladies of the 1960s popularized smaller breed dogs that were easy to transport. A new trend in dog ownership began when owners began dressing small dogs in sweaters. The 1960s ushered in major societal changes in dog care, health, and even animal ethics.

Veterinarians were few. In the 1960s, the science of veterinary medicine was an established degree that required a few “short” years of college education, at a time when most people got by with a high school graduation or less. It was not a very popular profession and it took too long compared to many other job options available. There were few applicants and few graduates of the program. Pet sitting was provided on demand only. Very sick and injured dogs used to be euthanized as the system did not have the technology or resources to prolong life as we enjoy it today.

Successful graduates were mostly men and went to work in remote areas of the country on farms. Specialized in the treatment of diseases and illnesses in large animals – bovine and equine. Veterinarians of the 1960s were also trained in the treatment of poultry diseases, so their focus was really on promoting the viability of farm animals for sales and consumption by the human food industry.

Dog Ownership in 1990: Veterinary Medicine Expands to Accommodate Urban Families and Their Pets

The 1990s saw sweeping changes in veterinary science. First, a college degree is increasingly recognized as a standard education for the workforce. Well, it is not mandatory to get a job in many fields, applicants with degrees are generally considered to have more job opportunities and better salaries with more social benefits. The 1990s also see more female students entering medicine and science programs, including veterinary science. However, the majority of students and teachers are still men.

Veterinary clinics have been popping up across the country to care for household pets who get sick or have an accident or need hospice care. The medical approach is still largely based on treating the problem, disease, or illness. New ideas for disease prevention and health education are only beginning to cause another shift in veterinary focus. From on-demand vaccinations to spaying and neutering to population control, major themes show a broader shift in practice as veterinary medicine expands to meet the early needs of globalization.

Having a dog today, or any pet, really shows how our animals have become part of our family. Today, most vets suggest vet insurance, run expensive top-of-the-line technology to diagnose every condition you take your dog to the vet for. Many veterinarians are now women, with female enrollment higher than male at universities. Many teachers in the program are now women as well. Veterinary programs take several years to complete as they cover a wide range of animal diseases and health promotion practices for the care of domestic animals and livestock. Universities that now offer highly specialized degree programs. The shift towards health promotion and prevention continues and is in full swing! Veterinary medicine today is proactive! Vaccinations are recommended from puppyhood throughout your dog’s life to prevent disease. Spaying and neutering are routinely done, dogs are living longer, and veterinary medicine is prepared to care for them with medications, advice, and therapeutic healers that offer a variety of symptom control and promote longevity.

Owning a dog in 2020: how modern dogs live

We have a great advantage to live in this age of technology and indulgence. There are so many dog ​​food and treat options out there that are just as healthy and home-grown as our human-grade food. Aside from a lot of challenging but fun decisions is which brand to choose for your dog.

Mass globalization has even provided more adaptation options than ever before! Do you want a pet store puppy? A breeder’s high-end show dog? Adopt a dog from a shelter? Adopt an elderly dog ​​to improve the last stage of his life and provide palliation and love? Today, there are so many resources available to help you make the right decision.

Today, the pet supply industry is abuzz with trendy toys and supplies and tricks for your new puppy or adult dog. Senior dogs are being treated like never before, with advances in dog health and wellness and insurance coverage. Owning a dog has never presented medical and ethical challenges as complex as they are today.

Mass globalization has even provided more adaptation options than ever before! Do you want a pet store puppy? A breeder’s high-end show dog? Adopt a dog from a shelter? Adopt an elderly dog ​​to improve the last stage of his life and provide palliation and love? Today, there are so many resources available to help you make the right decision.

Today, the pet supply industry is abuzz with trendy toys and supplies and tricks for your new puppy or adult dog. And older dogs are being treated like never before, with advances in dog health and wellness and insurance coverage. Owning a dog has never presented medical and ethical challenges as complex as they are today.

Dogs have truly become part of our families. In some cases, they even experience separation and divorce from their human owners. Dogs are known to share time between each new human home on a regular basis after separation.

In some families it is the children. As more people choose to remain single, or be in relationships and not have children, or are unable to have children, owning a dog or dogs is becoming a more popular option. The dogs in these situations get all the love and the owners get emotional satisfaction too. Owning a dog is also cheaper than having human children. Since the average child costs $14,000 a year up to the age of 18. By comparison, owning a dog costs $1,000 a year per dog. Dog ownership has a shorter timeline. Instead of ownership for life, with dogs you get a shorter trip of lasting memories and may or may not continue at another time. Making dogs a more flexible and affordable investment at any time!

Looking to the future

In the last 80 years, the world has seen great advances in dog ownership, training, supplies, and medical care. There are 89.7 million dog owners in the US in 2017, driving market demand and defining trends in dog care. Even the way veterinarians are educated and run their practice has gone through radical transitions. Technology, innovation and best practice research are the driving force of the animal health system we have today. But even during all this time, the unconditional love of a dog has not changed.


2006–07 Cleveland Cavaliers forward

The Cavaliers’ main story in the 2006/07 season, as it has been for the past three and likely will be for the foreseeable future, is LeBron James. LeBron is by far one of the best young players the league has seen in a long time, and his performance last season was as impressive as that of any other NBA player.

LeBron James was third in the league last year with 31.4 points per game. His scoring numbers have improved every year since he’s been in the league and there’s no reason to expect a drop in production any time soon. One thing Cavaliers fans would be happy to see is an increase in his 6.6 assists per game. He was once thought to be Oscar Robertson’s heir apparent, but James still has a lot of work to do to get his teammates more involved.

Apart from LeBron in the upcoming season, there are role players like Larry Hughes and Zydrunnas Illgauskas. Larry Hughes is coming off a somewhat disappointing season in which he was injured for two-thirds of the year. He should benefit greatly from playing a full season alongside one of the best players in the league and returning to his form from 2004 when he averaged 22.1 points per game. Illgauskas is a great scorer in central position and is often the key to how well the team is doing as a whole. If he can set a tone early, the Cavaliers are very hard to beat.

Other role players expected to contribute to the team include Donyell Marshall, Damon Jones and Anderson Varejao. Marshall is an inconsistent scorer at power forward who has long range. Jones is another inconsistent shooter who can shine from 3-point range. Both players are expected to improve on the mediocre seasons of 2005. Anderson Varejao is a player of pure energy who can propel the team with his reckless play. However, Varejao has to stay healthy and surpass the 60-game mark for the first time in his career.

Second-year head coach Mike Brown may not get a lot of press, but there’s no question he got the job done last year by leading the Cavaliers to their first playoff berth in a while and winning a playoff series. . However, more is expected of him and the team in 2006/07 and Brown needs to make sure his team is not happy with last year’s results. This isn’t a championship team yet, but they’re only a player or two away from that status.


The hawks pay Vick’s stock price

Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick faces charges of animal cruelty and sponsorship of dogfighting operations across state lines, but his legal troubles are the least of the concerns facing the Atlanta Falcons franchise. . Though Vick ultimately faces jail time if he’s convicted, what happens between now and then could affect the organization for years to come.

The indictment puts the Falcons in an awkward position. There are many people who were outraged by the lurid details of the torture and abuse the dogs suffered at the hands of Vick and his associates, outlined in the 18-page indictment filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District. of Virginia. There is some expectation that the team will take a hard line against Vick. Others plead for Vick to have his day in court before public opinion crucifies him.

Formally, the latter is also the opinion of the Falcons organization, which wants nothing more than for Vick to stand trial to prove his innocence, if possible. Truth be told, the outcome of the legal action probably won’t make a difference to the team from a business standpoint. If Vick is found guilty, he won’t play for the team anyway. And even if Vick is found not guilty, he has already poisoned the team’s season just by being charged. Maybe that’s unfair to Vick, but that’s exactly what happened in a short time.

Falcons owner Arthur Blank issued a statement that read in part: “This is a complicated and emotionally charged matter.” And furthermore, although he didn’t say it explicitly, this is also a no-win situation for his team. Vick is his star player, the face of the franchise, and he’s been a big draw for ticket sales since the day he was selected first overall in 2001. And there’s also a financial consideration. He is owed $6 million this year alone in salary. Blank must find some way to balance what Vick represents as the star of the organization against the consequences if Vick simply plays as much of the season as he can.

The problem is that if Vick plays, he will draw the ire of protesters throughout the season, as well as considerable attention from fans and media alike. Every Falcons press conference, every Michael Vick news story will mention the indictment and the trial, whether Vick is ultimately found not guilty or not guilty. And what if the Falcons have a losing season? Suddenly, that scrutiny is exacerbated to the extreme.

The alternative may come down to a quiet deal between Blank and Vick. Blank also said in his statement that “there are a wide range of interests and legal issues that must be carefully considered as we move forward, including our need to respect the due process that Michael is entitled to.” While it may seem like Blank would rather wait for legal action to conclude, he may also ultimately indicate a gentlemen’s agreement that Vick would take the season off, likely paid leave. This is also a less than ideal solution. The Falcons traded quarterback Matt Schaub to the Houston Texans. Heading into the season, they have Joey Harrington and Chris Redman to back Vick up.

Regardless of who steps up to replace him, releasing Vick may not be an option for financial reasons. Vick will have $13.57 million against the salary cap this season and $15.1 million in 2008. Because of his 10-year contract and a $37 million signing bonus, the Falcons would save virtually nothing to release him in either year.

And none of this takes into account the consequences that will affect the Falcons tangentially. It already started after an announcement by National Football League commissioner Roger Goodell that Vick would be allowed to practice and play with the Falcons while federal investigators continue their case against him. The activist group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals immediately issued a public protest and will take its complaint in person to the league’s main office today. PETA spokesman Dan Shannon called the charges against Vick “staggering” and there is talk of boycotts against the Falcons organization and/or the NFL itself if Vick is allowed to play. The Humane Society has also said that he will protest in some way.

Also, after the indictment was announced, Nike brought out a line of exclusive shoes bearing Vick’s name. The Air Zoom Vick V has been shelved indefinitely, though Nike’s other Vick-branded shoes will continue to be available at retail stores.

There will be more of this type of reaction as companies and other athletes strive to get as far away as possible from the negative stigma Vick’s actions have placed on him, the Falcons and the NFL. Some people will wholeheartedly support Vick. Others will claim that he is being singled out for his status as a high-profile athlete. But all these things are really beside the point. As NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy put it succinctly, “We are disappointed that Michael Vick has put himself in a position where a federal grand jury has returned an indictment against him.”

That’s right, guilty or not, the price has already been paid.


Baseball players of Latino origin in the Hall of Fame

Latino players have had a huge impact on baseball. The first Latino baseball player born in the Major Leagues was Luis Castro, who played for the Philadelphia Athletics in 1902. Castro was born in Medellin, Columbia.

Since then, many Latino baseball players have played Major League Baseball. There are approximately 150 Latino players in the Major Leagues today. And many of them are stars and possibly future Hall of Famers.

Albert Pujols, for example, was born in the Dominican Republic. Adrian Gonzales of the San Diego Padres is from Mexico. Iván Rodríguez and Jorge Posada were born in Puerto Rico. David Ortiz and Hanley Ramírez are also from the Dominican Republic. Just to name a few.

There are six former Major League Baseball players born in Latin America who have been inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame. Puerto Rican Roberto Clemente was the first Latino elected to the Hall of Fame in 1973. Roberto was a four-time batting champion and a 12-time Gold Glove winner. After his death in a plane crash, Clemente was unanimously elected to the Hall of Fame. The five-year waiting period a player has to wait to get into the Hall has been removed for Roberto. Since this rule was added, he is the only player that has been waived.

Roberto Clemente was also the first Latino player to win a World Series as a starter with the Pirates in 1960. He is also the first Latino to win a League Most Valuable Player award which he won in 1966, and to win a Series MVP. World Cup in 1971.

Pitcher and Dominican Juan Marichal was the second Latino to be inducted into the Hall of Fame in 1983. Juan was an eleven-time All Star and won the All Star game MVP award in 1965. His lifetime earned run average was 2.89. He won 243 games and struck out 2,303.

Cuban-born Tony Pérez was inducted in 2000. He was best known for his years with Cincinnati’s Big Red Machine. Pérez batted .279 with 379 home runs and 1,652 RBIs.

Rod Carew is from Panama and was drafted in 1991. Rod won seven batting titles, finished with a career .328 average and 3,053 hits. In 1972 Carew did something no player had done before and hasn’t done since. He won the batting title without hitting a single home run. He was the American League Rookie of the Year in 1967 and the Most Valuable Player in 1977.

Born in Puerto Rico, Orlando Cepeda entered the Hall of Fame in 1999. Cepeda was the National League Rookie of the Year in 1958 and won the Most Valuable Player Award in 1967. He has a career batting average of .297. , 379 home runs and 1,365 runs hit.

Luis Aparicio was born in Venezuela and was elected to the Hall in 1984. Luis was the 1956 American League Rookie of the Year and won nine Gold Gloves. He finished with 2,677 hits and led the American League in stolen bases nine straight seasons.

There are three other Latino players in the Hall of Fame. Martín DiHigo, Cristóbal Torriente and José Méndez, all from Cuba, were Negro league stars but never played in the Major Leagues.

With all the great Latin players in the game today, it won’t be long before there are more than seven established players in Cooperstown.


the best there was

In the annals of sports, in each one in particular, be it basketball, baseball or others, there are those who are revered by their peers and sportswriters of all generations who award an individual as the best there was. In professional football, it stands to reason that now, during the current NFL season, we look back at the one person many consider “the best there ever was.” In the storied history of the NFL, even by today’s standards, one individual is the only one who exemplifies sportsmanship, true grit and determination despite overwhelming odds and for eighteen years he reigned supreme as the best quarterback ever. never played the game. There are many who emphatically state that Johnny Unitas was the best there was. Even today, there are those who feel that Johnny U could command any team, read today’s complex defense playbooks, and literally take the entire game to a new level of excitement, skill, and fearlessness.

With his signature flat top haircut, Johnny Unitas ascended to the highest level of professional football. Few, if any, sports stories are more dramatic or more comprehensive than the story of Johnny Unitas. He was, after all, a ninth-round pick for the Pittsburgh Steelers in 1955. Even though Unitas was eliminated before he had thrown a single pass in a game, he was still determined to play. For the rest of the year, Unitas substituted his construction job for playing semi-pro football for $6 a game. Back then, players were called upon to play what is commonly known as Iron Man football. That is playing in both defensive and attacking positions. Johnny Unitas excelled at everything. But it was his passing ability that finally caught the attention of other professional scouts.

It was after the 1955 season that Baltimore Colts head coach Weeb Ewbank learned of an “outstanding prospect” in the wastelands of Pittsburgh. Ewbank signed Johnny for $17,000 on a team basis. Scheduled strictly as a backup, Unitas got his chance in Game 4 when the Colts’ starter was injured. And they say the rest is history! Over the next 18 seasons, “Johnny U” amassed a book of game-winning exploits that have stood as the benchmark by which all other quarterbacks are measured. Many of his achievements have remained intact for more than fifty years. In the entire history of the NFL there has never been another Johnny U. Sure, there were others like Bart Star, Dan Marino, Brett Favre, Tom Brady, but it was Johnny Unitas who put the NFL on the map and in the consciousness. of the nations.

Without a doubt, it was his last-second heroism in the 1958 NFL title game, often called “the greatest game ever played,” that made Unitas a household name and began the legend. The greatest game between the Colts and Giants was played before a national television audience, it gave Unitas the opportunity to display all of his wonderful attributes, confidence, courage, leadership, playmaking genius and passing ability, all without the book of plays. by today’s coaches. Just think of Johnny Unitas as the quarterback today. He once told Weeb Ewbank to sit back, relax and just enjoy the game. The confidence and determination displayed under intense pressure in a collision sport like NFL football just showcased the true talents of Johnny Unita.

As in any professional sport, the era has its way of slowing down the great skill one had and in 1974 Johnny Unitas had to leave the game that he single handedly brought into the living rooms of the nations. A household name that all aspiring football players, especially young quarterbacks, tried to emulate. He was always recovering from injuries that became a Unitas trademark. A typical incident occurred in 1958, when he led Baltimore to the Western Conference title, he was hit by the Packers’ Johnny Symank in Game 6 and hospitalized with three broken ribs and a punctured lung. Four games later, he led the Colts from a 27-7 halftime deficit to a 35-27 victory over the San Francisco 49ers, a performance that rated higher than the season’s celebrated title game. .

Unitas might have been overlooked as a young player, but he was always an energetic and confident leader. “Everything I do,” he said, “I always have a reason to do it.” Even late in that championship game, he disregarded Ewbank’s instructions to keep the ball on the ground. “We don’t want an interception here,” the coach reminded him during a timeout. Two moves later, inside the 10, Unitas passes Jim Mutscheller down to the one. When asked about the risk of an interception, Unitas said, “If I had seen the danger of that, I would have thrown the ball out of bounds. When you know what you’re doing, you don’t get intercepted.” Unitas threw for 32 touchdowns in 1959, and the Colts again beat the Giants in the title game. In a 31-16 victory, Unitas rushed for the go-ahead touchdown and passed for 264 yards and two touchdowns.

His 3,481 passing yards led the NFL in 1963. The next season he was the league’s Most Valuable Player when he led the Colts to the NFL’s best record at 12-2 and was first in yards per pass attempt (9.26). . Earning another MVP in 1967, he had a league-high 58.5 completion percentage, passing for 3,428 yards and 20 touchdowns in the Colts’ 11-1-2 season. After being injured for most of the 1968 season, Unitas returned and led the Colts in their only scoring drive in historic Super Bowl III, a 16-7 loss to the New York Jets. Two years later, in the Colts’ 16-13 win over the Dallas Cowboys in Super Bowl V, he threw a 75-yard touchdown pass to John Mackey before suffering an injury late in the first half.

Nagging injuries eventually caught up with him and in 1972 the Colts under new coach Don Shula were forced to bench Unitas. The following January he sold him to the San Diego Chargers, for whom he played just one season before retiring. In his 18-year career, Unitas threw for 40,239 yards and 290 touchdowns in 211 games. What made Unitas special, Berry said, “was his uncanny instinct to call the right play at the right time, his icy composition under fire, his fierce competitiveness and his utter disregard for the his own safety.” On Sept. 11, 2002, as the rest of the nation remembered a national tragedy, Unitas was working out at a physical therapy center in Timonium, a suburb of Baltimore, when he suffered a fatal heart attack and quietly went down in history. He was 69 years old. The best he had, now he was gone.


The Dish: Ugly Americans at the World Championships

There is no joy in Krzyzewski-ville.

Maybe it’s because they’re celebrating it in Japan, so it’s challenging to watch it on TV here in North America. Maybe it’s because the 2002 World Championships in Indiana (third place) and the 2004 Olympics (third place) are still in our mouths. Maybe it’s because we still associate the United States in these world tournaments represented by the rude Allen Iverson and Stephon Marbury and, well, we don’t like those guys.

But whatever the reason, no one seems to care about the World Championship in basketball.

Coach K leads the squad, which until Wednesday was undefeated in the group stage. The US opened with a 111-100 victory against Puerto Rico, which doesn’t sound like much until you realize that Puerto Rico stunned the world by defeating the United States in the first game of the Athens Olympics last year. two years. The US also crushed Yao and the Chinese and Primoz Brezec and the Slovenians.

It seemed that, before Wednesday’s game against Italy, coach K had turned the current group into a more humble and less ridiculous group. The last Olympic team and (even more so) the 2002 World Championship team were very easy to criticize. Somehow they seemed like a symbol of American arrogance and playfulness around the world: clueless millionaires dancing around the Parthenon, calling it an ugly pile of rocks. I’m an American, but did I really have to root for Marbury, Iverson and Lamar Odom? Ew. With Krzyzewski around, I had higher hopes: hopes of fundamental basketball and, like, being able to enjoy my team’s wins.

Unfortunately, as adversity hit Italy on Wednesday, the US stars returned to one-on-one play and shooting from long range. They found themselves down 12 points in the second half, and only late performances from Carmelo Anthony and Dywane Wade saved them. Still, the seeds of disaster have been sown, and this group officially has the potential to become just as unsavory as its predecessors. They haggle. They dribble a little more. They still haggle a bit more. They threaten to go to the hoop. They threaten a little more. They get frustrated and pass the ball out of bounds. It happened over and over again. If it hadn’t been for Anthony and Wade saving America’s bacon on Wednesday, you’d be reading nothing but basketball humiliation articles once again.

And believe me: that humiliation will come. It’s probably not Coach K’s fault; he relies on really young players who play in a league that encourages one-on-one play and doesn’t teach their youngsters how to pass effectively. And that’s the whole international game: unselfishness. Unfortunately, selfishness is the biggest part of what these children have. Oh yeah, that and the bad free throws.

Are the Red Sox fully cooked?

BoDog Bookmakers, No. Despite their recent struggles, the Red Sox remained 6 1/2 games behind in the AL East and four games off the pace in the wild-card standings. They still have 37 games to play, including four against the Yankees and three against the White Sox and Twins. If they can survive this next stretch (eight straight road games), the Red Sox could really start in September, a month in which they play 16 games at home.

The favorite college football team to win the National Championship on the BoDog board is Notre Dame, at 4-1. Are those odds so low because of the Irish’s huge fan base?

BB, They’re not too low. Granted, the Notre Dame Fighting Irish are coming off a 34-20 loss to the Buckeyes in the 2006 Fiesta Bowl, but the time seems right for them to make a serious run at the BCS National Championship. Quarterback Brady Quinn has been stellar under coach Charlie Weis and many of his offensive and defensive players are coming back. Meanwhile, teams like Texas and USC have lost stars on both sides of the ball due to the NFL Draft. All signs point to Notre Dame or Ohio State being the favorites to go all the way.

Can you give us your favorite team in double figures (10-1 or better) to win the 2007 NCAA title game and tell us why?

BB, A good sleeper pick would be the California Golden Bears, currently 12-1. While the USC Trojans have been making history in recent years, Cal has been quietly building. Now, with USC weakened by the NFL Draft, the Golden Bears could be on the verge of taking control of the Pac-10. Last season, Cal went 8-4 with a powerful running game that had running backs Marshawn Lynch and Justin Forsett in the backfield. The two running backs combined for 2,245 total yards and 16 touchdowns. With both running backs returning as juniors, Cal’s offense appears to be even better. On defense, preseason All-American tackle Brandon Mebane leads a team with eight returning starters. So absolutely, a Pac-10 crown is within reach, as is a national title.

With the PGA Championship behind us and Tiger Woods dominating as ever, the last big golf event of the season is the Ryder Cup in September. Since we’ll all be preoccupied with football by then, I’ll ask now: Does the Ryder Cup make a big impact? And do bettors tend to bet on the side of the Americans no matter what?

BB, All true sports fans have time for the Ryder Cup, and bettors love it for its heads-up format. Sure, you can place head-to-head bets in a regular tournament, but the competitors aren’t actively competing against each other, they’re competing against the entire field. In other words, we expect a lot of interest in the Ryder Cup in September. Most golf bettors are knowledgeable enough to know that the Americans have struggled in past Ryder Cups; Tiger Woods’ Ryder Cup record is 7-11-2 in four appearances and Phil Mickelson is 9-8-3 in five appearances. With the event taking place at Ireland’s K Club, Europeans will have home court advantage. We’ll have to see if national pride gets in the way of bettors’ objectivity.


Mini Golden Dawn Cakes


3 cups of flour

¼ teaspoon salt

1/2 teaspoon baking soda

3/4 cup butter (1 ½ sticks), room temperature

½ cup vegetable shortening such as Crisco

3 cups of sugar

5 large eggs, room temperature

1 cup milk, room temperature

1 teaspoon vanilla extract

2 tablespoons of orange juice

1 tablespoon orange zest

6 ounces mini chocolate chips


1. Preheat oven to 325°

2. In a large bowl, combine the flour, salt, and baking soda. Mix well.

3. Using another bowl, cream together the butter and shortening until light and fluffy.

4. Add the sugar and continue beating for 5 minutes.

5. Add the eggs, one at a time, beating well after each addition.

6. Add vanilla extract, orange juice, and orange zest. Keep beating.

6. Add half of the flour mixture to the dough. Add a little milk and continue mixing. Add the remaining flour and then the remaining milk. Mix well.

7. Fold in the mini chocolate chips.

8. Spray the inside of the mini Bundt-lette pans with nonstick cooking spray.
9. Fill pans with batter to within ½ inch of top.

10. Bake for 30 minutes, or until toothpick inserted comes out clean.

11. Cool in pan for 5 minutes. Invert onto a wire rack and cool completely. Sprinkle with powdered sugar and decorate with fresh flowers.

Makes 16 mini cupcakes.

You have permission to reprint this article electronically or in print, free of charge, provided each article is:

1. Printed in its complete form without changes

2. Include an active link

3. A courtesy copy of your post is sent to the above contact

4. And at the bottom of each article the following signature appears:

About the author: Rondi Hillstrom Davis is co-author of the award-winning book Together: Creating Family Traditions. To see her website full of family ideas, visit


Supervision for therapists: a review

I have wanted to write this article for a long time, but convention often prevented me from putting pen to paper. In science, understood wisdom is hard to change; any new paradigm is always greeted with skepticism and dismissive attitudes. However, I am now independent of those who might make life difficult for a lonely voice, so I think it is time to make the case against therapist supervision.

Like many therapists and psychologists, over the years I had to submit to the task of being supervised and supervising others. To clarify my objections to the process, I must first lay out the conventions and current wisdom of the last 100 years.

What is monitoring and what is it for?

Therapy is seen as an arduous task where we have to listen to problems and difficulties through the lives of other people’s stories. Difficult and stressful clients often tell us about what is happening in their lives now or in the past that is keeping them from overcoming those past traumas or present life complications. Most listening professionals can, of course, empathize with the client and, through whatever style of therapy, help the person to resolve their problems and face the future. That is the fundamental aspect of the therapeutic process.

For many less stable therapists, they face the burden of not being objective about the client’s situation and often take the burden of the client’s problems personally for themselves. After a while they face collapse and personal misery, not because of their own problems, but because they cannot mentally separate themselves from the client.

The case for supervision then is primarily one of coaching, the supervisor (usually a very experienced counselor) listening to the therapist to help that person see the client’s problems and their own in perspective. I think for a new therapist in training and a person with low self-confidence, this can help them move on and help prevent personal crises. Most organizations insist on one hour of supervision for every six hours of customer contact.

So why, having previously stated a reasonable case for oversight, am I so against the practice? Well, I will address this in the following points:

1. Most supervision is ineffective

2. Supervisors are themselves problematic

3. It is an exercise in spinning money to take advantage

4. Most famous therapists were never supervised in the modern sense.

5. It is a power game and a selfish role playing between parents and children.

6. Can be replaced easily.

Taking my first point, most supervision is ineffective; I state this from personal supervisory experience and anecdotal evidence from other therapists. When you submit to supervision, most counselors and therapists report that they feel it is a critical experience and not a supportive one. Most feel that they are being challenged to justify what they said and did in individual therapy sessions. Therefore, most are not honest or communicative in these sessions, but in fact, as any psychologist knows, they will show themselves in the best light possible. This immediately undermines the whole concept of support and guidance. If the therapist feels judged, he cannot benefit from the exercise and therefore does not feel able to grow from his current position as counselor.

The second point is the supervisors themselves. Most are not experienced supervisors but are qualified in their particular field of theory. They bear the burden of supervision because they are required to do so. However, this is not the most important aspect and I will analyze it in the next point. My own experience and that of other supervisors is that they are hearing cases secondhand, trying to judge beyond their personal experience, trying to see the mind of the therapist in front of them, and worse, putting a time limit on what they are doing. the relationship. In general, they have very little interest in the client and very little in the therapist in front of them.

My next and third point is: money! Supervisors are paid by the therapist. They know that any new counselor to become qualified needs as many client contact hours and supervision hours according to the theory requirements to qualify. This is the real crux of supervision: the money to be made from new advisors (most of whom will never qualify) is a high earning exercise. The motivation for supervision then is not a feeling of noble support but a simple commercial exercise of exploiting counselors and therapists for money. If that sounds harsh, too bad. The truth often hurts.

I guess the best way is to invent your own theory of therapy and supervise yourself as most of the famous psychologists of the past did, Freud, Jung and many other historical figures did not have to undergo supervision but in fact kept his own advice. The method they used was quite different from the onerous way we use to monitor today. If you are confident in your own ability and feel successful with your clients (and only you and your client can judge that), then you don’t need anyone else to tell you.

My fifth point is perhaps out of respect for Eric Berne, the creator of Transactional Analysis (personally, one of the best theories of psychological thought). In TA Berne enunciates the eloquent concept of the PAC model, Parent, Adult and Child as mental states. I do not want to stop here in theory and we do not have space. As a supervisor, you are acting as a Parent to the counselor’s Child ego state. This means that the supervisor is not in the position of a coach or mentor, but rather that of a superior and is often critical and fatherly in guidance. This does not matter if the supervisor assumes a role of critical parent or caring parent: the power play is the same. The counselor submits through childhood experience to a symbiosis of the parents with the supervisor. This is unhealthy and restrictive, and most counselors will take on the role of the adaptive child in that they will submit to supervision as a way of making their parent (supervisor) happy. As Berne said, we all have a little teacher inside our heads who is constantly trying to make the best of a situation and, in the case of a child, love and affection. If you can’t get love, attention will do, even critical attention.

My final point is that it can be easily replaced. Many years ago, a group of like-minded counselors decided to form a partnership away from the mainstream organizations that try to dominate the mental health regimen with rules and controlling doctrine. They met once a month as a large group, sometimes as many as 60 people. They would have a speaker on some topic of interest, who was not allowed to speak for more than 30 minutes, as most psychologists know, it is the height of our individual attention to listen and be still. Afterwards people mingled and chatted. Nothing too heavy, books read, clients seen, money talks and other general aspects of counseling. However, most importantly they formed smaller groups that lived close to each other. These groups of five or six therapists would meet once a fortnight in a person’s home and this would rotate. These meetings were relaxed and informal. You can bring medical histories or clinical problems. Each, in turn, had the opportunity to talk about what was bothering them and, in return, received advice, wisdom, or just general talk from the other members of the group. The group did not have to solve any problems and you could choose to just listen if you wanted. The idea was one of support and a feeling of a non-judgmental group. (Do not confuse this with a Group Therapy meeting). These are your peers and friends, not your supervising judge. I think the atmosphere in these groups was ten times more encouraging than any supervised session. Of course, some basic ground rules must be observed, not judge, respect other people’s theoretical point of view (everyone can be different schools of thought), this often leads to cross-fertilization of ideas. It should not be told, only discussed, this leads to an informed non-dictatorial environment. Finally, have tea and biscuits, be humorous, have fun – this is a time for you to feel good about yourself and the fact that you are part of a community of people who care about each other and fight for a better world of health. mental.

In summer:

I personally have to supervise new counseling students as they see their first clients. I try to bring a supportive and coaching approach to the process. I encourage my students to form peer groups and count their hours in these groups as supervised time. I think once you’ve qualified, a peer group should be all the support you need. Current supervisors can replace their lost income by giving open lectures or group talks (30 minutes). If they really are as good as they think, then they can prove it in front of a group. Difficult decision – to be judged – isn’t it?

To reiterate that I am against supervision. It must stop except for initial training purposes. Only a therapist and her client can do the work of therapy. I know that this article will have a lot of critics and those who will make fun of my views. So be it. As I said at the beginning, any new paradigm is initially forced to move away from the convention. I just hope that over time we can realize how unhealthy the current system has become.

Professor Stephen F. Myler PhD (Psychology)